- Asymmetric Investing
- Posts
- The False Comfort of Safety: When Icons Fall
The False Comfort of Safety: When Icons Fall
Nike and Starbucks have fallen from favor and may never recover.
One of the reasons Asymmetric Investing favors smaller, more disruptive companies is that it’s hard to gauge how long an established company will remain in power. If you buy a stock for a 30 P/E ratio and the company only grows earnings at 3% it’ll take 23 years to “earn” your money back.
Last week, I talked about the four reasons stocks go up — revenue growth, margin expansion, multiple expansion, and buybacks — and older, highly valued companies can drop dramatically if revenue growth stalls (or goes negative) and multiples drop. Ironically, buying “safe” stocks is a higher risk for investors. I’ll explain more below.
As for this week, markets were down overall, especially the big industrial stocks.
It was the calm before the storm for the Asymmetric Portfolio this week. GM reported earnings, but most companies in the portfolio report in the next two weeks. These two weeks will likely determine whether the portfolio continues to outperform this year or falls back to the market.
Asymmetric Investing is a freemium business model, which means the free version is made possible by ads. Sign up for premium here to avoid ads and get 2x the content and access to the Asymmetric Portfolio.
Whiskey: The Tangible Asset for Your Portfolio
Most people fail to diversify their investments.
They invest all their money in intangible assets like stocks, bonds, and crypto.
The solution - fine whiskey.
Whiskey is a tangible asset, providing a unique appeal compared to other investments. Casks of whiskey have measurable attributes like size, age, and weight, making their value indisputable. This physical nature allows for clear identification of issues and adjustments to safeguard future value.
Vinovest’s expertise in managing these tangible assets ensures your whiskey casks are stored and insured to the highest standards, enhancing their worth over time. Discover how this tangible, appreciating asset can enhance your investment portfolio.
In Case You Missed It
Here’s some of the content I put out this week.
GM’s Stock Jumps on Incredible Quarter: People are still buying big trucks and SUVs, driving GM’s profit, but it’s progress on EVs that we need to watch closely.
$1 Billion Stablecoin Deal: Stripe made a huge move to get into the stablecoin business.
Earnings Preview: Part 3: I covered what I expect this quarter from another 5 stocks in the Asymmetric Portfolio.
Earnings Preview: Part 4: And rounded out the list here.
The Fall of Icons
Over the past five years, the S&P 500 has generated a total return of 108.2%. Short-term government bonds would have generated positive returns no matter the duration.
Nike would have lost you money!
Starbucks would have lost a similar amount if it wasn’t for the recent bounce when former Chipotle CEO Brian Niccol was announced as CEO.
What went wrong at these companies? There were operational problems, but let’s start with what investors were paying. You can see below that shares of both Nike and Starbucks were trading for over 30x earnings for much of the past five years. Even today, they’re trading for over 22x earnings.
What are you getting for that price? Companies growing in the mid-single digits…until recently.
Earlier this month, Nike announced that revenue dropped 10% in the fiscal first quarter of 2025. This week, Starbucks said same-store sales fell 7% in the most recent quarter and revenue would be down 3% overall.
Investing is all about risk (downside) and opportunity (upside). If you’re paying 30x earnings and a company is only growing in the mid-single digits, any hiccup could send shares lower (slow/negative revenue growth and collapsing multiples).
What appears to be safety from a big brand becomes a risk of brands being disrupted.
To give an idea of where I think a lot of risk lies today, here are companies trading for over 30x earnings and growing revenue a 5% or less over the past year:
Apple (0.4% growth, 36 P/E)
Tesla (1.4% growth, 61 P/E)
Abbott Labs (3.1% growth, 35 P/E)
Texas Instruments (-14.5% growth, 34 P/E)
American Tower (3.9% growth, 42 P/E)
These are just a few of the companies worth over $100 billion trading at high multiples and growing slowly. Are they the next Nike or Starbucks?
Maybe.
It may sound crazy, but even more highly valued companies can be “cheaper” if they’re growing faster. Or, investors can get similar growth for a much lower price. Here are some of the growth rates and multiples in the Asymmetric Portfolio:
Coinbase (74.2% growth, 39 P/E)
MGM Resorts (15.1% growth, 15 P/E)
Airbnb (15.6% growth, 18 P/E)
General Motors (6.3% growth, 6 P/E)
Portillo’s (13.4% growth, 32 P/E)
These companies may not be household names and none are worth over $100 billion. However, the opportunity for future growth, margin expansion, multiple expansion, and buybacks outweigh the risk.
With this view on valuation, as a portfolio, I don’t need every stock to wildly outperform the market. I can be completely wrong on two or three of these stocks as long as I’m VERY right on one of them.
The same can’t be said about buying slow-growth stocks for high multiples. You better be right on all of them or you’ll underperform the market.
Sometimes, the riskiest investments may seem the safest. That’s a lesson it took decades for me to understand.
You can get all Asymmetric Investing content, including deep dives, stock trades, and ongoing coverage of Asymmetric Universe stocks with a premium membership.
All for only $100 per year.
Disclaimer: Asymmetric Investing provides analysis and research but DOES NOT provide individual financial advice. Travis Hoium may have a position in some of the stocks mentioned. All content is for informational purposes only. Asymmetric Investing is not a registered investment, legal, or tax advisor or a broker/dealer. Trading any asset involves risk and could result in significant capital losses. Please do your own research before acquiring stocks.
Reply