A Moment of Crisis: Cruise Pulls Its Autonomous Fleet

An accident in October has now led Cruise to pull its entire fleet and do a review of the company's culture.

Thank you for being part of Asymmetric Investing. Readers like you help this newsletter grow and you can help by sharing it on social media with the links above or forward it to your favorite investor. I appreciate your support.

General Motors is now the worst-performing position in the Asymmetric Portfolio on a dollar basis, down $72.80 from a total investment of $401.99. This is tied for the most I’ve invested in any company along with Spotify and Airbnb, so it’s an outsized loss.

Yesterday, we found out the core of my asymmetric investment thesis may be falling apart.

Cruise said it is not only pulling all fully autonomous vehicles from roads (which happened on October 26, 2023), it is pulling all vehicles from public roads. This is huge news and calls into question the future of Cruise itself. Here’s some background and what I think about Cruise and GM stock now.

What Happened at Cruise

I highlighted the accident that caused this pullback in an article here, so go through that article if you aren’t aware of the accident and Cruise’s response.

What has changed is the scope of Cruise’s response and GM’s role in the company. I’ll start with the pause of operations:

Voluntary pause of supervised and manual operations 

On October 26, we announced a pause of all our driverless operations while we take time to examine our processes, systems, and tools and improve how we operate. In the coming days, we are also pausing our supervised and manual AV operations in the U.S., affecting roughly 70 vehicles. This orderly pause is a further step to rebuild public trust while we undergo a full safety review. We will continue to operate our vehicles in closed course training environments and maintain an active simulation program in order to stay focused on advancing AV technology.

Cruise is dedicated to rebuilding trust and operating at the highest standards of safety. We are committed to keeping our customers, regulators, and the public informed throughout this process.

That’s not all. GM and third-party experts are taking a much more active role in overseeing Cruise’s operations.

  1. Craig Glidden to assume the role of Chief Administrative Officer for Cruise - Glidden is GM’s Executive Vice President of Legal and Policy and Cruise board member and he will “be expanding his support of Cruise and working closely with Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt and the Cruise Senior Leadership Team to oversee the workstreams around Transparency and Community Engagement.“

  2. Retention of an independent expert to conduct a comprehensive safety assessment - Cruise will hire independent experts to “perform a full assessment of Cruise’s safety operations and culture.

  3. Expansion of Exponent’s scope - Exponent is a third-party engineering consulting firm hired to investigate the October accident and the scope of their work was expanded to “include a comprehensive review of our safety systems and technology.“

Everything is under review and GM is taking a very watchful eye. I have to wonder if Cruise and GM’s initial review uncovered more safety concerns or even culture concerns than they knew about before.

What is the Future of Cruise?

The simple answer is, that we don’t know.

Cruise was one of only two companies with real Level 4 autonomous driving technology in the field at scale (Alphabet’s Waymo is the other) and from the outside, it appeared Cruise was more problematic on San Francisco’s streets than Waymo (something I overlooked). Riders loved the service, but vehicles were often confused during edge cases and took preventative safety measures that left traffic stopped.

It was a safety maneuver to get the Cruise vehicle off the road that led to the vehicle dragging the person ~20 feet in October.

I don’t think Cruise or GM give up on more than a decade of work and millions of miles of autonomous driving overnight, so I don’t think this is the end for Cruise. But will expansion plans slow? Will Kyle Vogt be replaced? Will GM take a more meaningful role or ownership stake? We don’t know yet.

Cruise can use this as a moment of crisis or a moment of opportunity to adjust the culture and focus of the company on safety and reliability. If it does the latter, Cruise could be a better, more valuable company from this learning experience.

Or it could collapse.

Asymmetric investing involves risk and Cruise was absolutely a risk. But buying Cruise through GM means we also have some protection because GM’s core business is trading for single-digit earnings multiples. An analyst even asked on the last conference call what GM was going to do with Cruise because it seemed to have $0 or negative value in GM’s stock price. So, from a stock price perspective, I don’t see Cruise’s current situation as a negative.

I’m not going to miss the upside of autonomous driving because of a moment of crisis. Some of the best success stories in investing have crises that seem insurmountable (Netflix with Qwikster or Apple nearly going bankrupt in 1997 are perfect examples). It’s how these moments of crisis are answered that determines the future.

I still see an asymmetric upside in Cruise, but I’m well aware that the company may fail to produce any meaningful results.

If Cruise closes up shop, I’ll sell my GM stock, but we aren’t there yet.

What do you want more of?

Feedback helps Asymmetric Investing improve.

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Disclaimer: Asymmetric Investing provides analysis and research but DOES NOT provide individual financial advice. Travis Hoium may have a position in some of the stocks mentioned. All content is for informational purposes only. Asymmetric Investing is not a registered investment, legal, or tax advisor or a broker/dealer. Trading any asset involves risk and could result in significant capital losses. Please, do your own research before acquiring stocks.

Reply

or to participate.